<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JNJ BTW A-OK: a review for F500 Business Blogging Wiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/jnj-btw-a-ok-a-review-for-f500-business-blogging-wiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/jnj-btw-a-ok-a-review-for-f500-business-blogging-wiki/</link>
	<description>making sense of PR and the media landscape</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan For Johnson&#38;Johnson Stock Market</title>
		<link>http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/jnj-btw-a-ok-a-review-for-f500-business-blogging-wiki/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan For Johnson&#38;Johnson Stock Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/?p=103#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Its good for our technology industry that companies like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stocknod.com/JNJ-Johnson-And-Johnson-stock-prices.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Johnson And Johnson&lt;/a&gt; are now start their official blog writing. But most of the cases we see that they are not got too much comment because they can not revised their comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good for our technology industry that companies like <a href="http://www.stocknod.com/JNJ-Johnson-And-Johnson-stock-prices.aspx" rel="nofollow">Johnson And Johnson</a> are now start their official blog writing. But most of the cases we see that they are not got too much comment because they can not revised their comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Expert Blogging Advice from Business Blogging Wiki</title>
		<link>http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/jnj-btw-a-ok-a-review-for-f500-business-blogging-wiki/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Expert Blogging Advice from Business Blogging Wiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/?p=103#comment-191</guid>
		<description>[...] In some cases even if the company is talking, no one is talking back much. But at least they are trying to engage in the conversation. For example Johnson &amp; Johnson&#8217;s blog, JNJ BTW (Am I the only own who thinks that&#8217;s a dumb name?) has some interesting posts, but they rarely get any comments. Is that because they rarely reply to them when they do come in? You can read a review by Richard Young on his Whole Nine Yards blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In some cases even if the company is talking, no one is talking back much. But at least they are trying to engage in the conversation. For example Johnson &amp; Johnson&#8217;s blog, JNJ BTW (Am I the only own who thinks that&#8217;s a dumb name?) has some interesting posts, but they rarely get any comments. Is that because they rarely reply to them when they do come in? You can read a review by Richard Young on his Whole Nine Yards blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/jnj-btw-a-ok-a-review-for-f500-business-blogging-wiki/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richkyoung.wordpress.com/?p=103#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these great suggestions!  Polls and surveys, huh?  It&#039;s something I&#039;ve been thinking of... but haven&#039;t figured out how to do it yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these great suggestions!  Polls and surveys, huh?  It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been thinking of&#8230; but haven&#8217;t figured out how to do it yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
